It checks search results for dangerous sites, scans encrypted websites, and identifies fraudulent content. It compares any website you visit to a huge database of dangerous sites and also shows you which sites were blocked and why.īitdefender also stops you visiting pages with downloadable malware. McAfee: Web Securityīitdefender’s anti-phishing protection is great - it blocked all phishing sites I tried to access in my tests. McAfee’s real-time protection engine performed as well as Bitdefender’s, successfully blocking me from downloading or opening any malware files when I put it to the test. That said, you can schedule scans for a convenient time when you’re not using your computer. While I could still use my PC for browsing the web, streaming videos and gaming were impossible. However, unlike Bitdefender, it did cause some slowdown on my computer.
Bitdefender vs malwarebytes full#
Like Bitdefender, McAfee’s full system scan took around an hour. McAfee uses traditional malware detection techniques, checking files against a huge virus database and using heuristics to identify potentially dangerous files too.
McAfee’s antivirus scanner performed just as well as Bitdefender’s, identifying 100% of the malware samples I tested it with. I tried to download a variety of infected files to my computer, and Bitdefender Shield blocked all of them before I could begin to do so. The full system scan took around an hour, but this wasn’t an issue as it was so lightweight it barely affected my system performance.īitdefender’s real-time protection, Bitdefender Shield, is also excellent. I tested Bitdefender by downloading hundreds of malware samples to my computer, including viruses, trojans, rootkits and ransomware. Most scanning happens in the cloud, so the scans only take up a tiny amount of your CPU.īitdefender detected 100% of the malware on my computer after a full system scan. It uses machine learning and a huge directory to detect malware. Bitdefender’s malware scanner is lightweight but powerful.
0 kommentar(er)
